6/30/2023 0 Comments Fontagent pro 4.1 for macYou move to X for far superior system stability, much improved multitasking, the gorgeous graphics system. Is this really a deciding factor for designers choosing to upgrade to OS X? Maybe, but it's just one factor out of many. I'd say there we're there already, but it's on the edge of getting better than it was before, instead just about equal. well, you want some kind of solution to be there, and for it be as transparent as possible. That's why FontBook is so welcome - I hope and expect it'll raise the bar for font management apps.īut anyway. apps on OS X can and should be much improved. (Less than people say, though.) And the UI for every one, bar none, of the F.M. And certainly having a true multi-user system and Classic complicate matters. I do agree that until font managements apps on OS X offer features *superior* to their OS 9 versions, you can't honestly say font management on OS X is any better. And both FontAgent and FontReserve go well beyond the much-loved ATM Deluxe in checking for and repairing corrupt fonts. If you haven't used them for some time, definitely check them out - they've improved considerably since their initial versions, and they work well. I was just responding to the statement suggesting there was no decent way to manage fonts on OS X.Īgain, I have to say that Suitcase 10.2 and Font Agent 1.3 are both perfectly good font management solutions. Well, drivers for older but expensive equipment are a whole 'nother (off-topic) issue. That's not even taking into account all the hardware driver issues I also mentioned. Perhaps my exact wording wasn't perfect, but if the solution doesn't work as well in OS X as it does in OS 9, people that deal with a lot of fonts all the time have one less reason to upgrade. The mere existence of a solution that "sort of works" in no way invalidates my statement. You can also get a Windows box for less than a Mac box in most cases, with more expandability and upgradability. Hell, Windows can do most of what a Mac can do if you don't care about the elegance or efficiency or user friendliness. Indeed they "work" to some extent, but if all you are talking about is just that you can indeed get the job done with them without regard to the efficiency or elegance of the solution, than why are we all on a Mac forum discussing this? You can point flaws in each of these solutions - and each has its frustrations - but I've tested all of the above (except for MasterJuggler), and they all work.Īpple polish is all well and good, but implying there's just no way to manage fonts in OS X just isn't true (A week ago, I would have added FontReserve, but Extensis just bought 'em out, so we'll see where that goes.) What about Suitcase? FontAgent? MasterJuggler? FontBook looks completely welcome, but I have to wonder at statements like these.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |